Skip to content
ReynoldsAttorneys-logowebsite
  • Home
  • Meet Our Consultants
  • Legal Services
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
    • Labour & Employment Law
    • Copyright IP & Technology Law
    • Data Privacy Law
    • Commercial Litigation Law
    • B-BBEE Law
    • Wills, Estates & Trusts
    • Family Law
    • Mediation & Arbitration
    • Conveyancing
    • NGO Law
    • Energy Law
    • Non-legal Services
  • Clients & Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Meet Our Consultants
  • Legal Services
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
    • Labour & Employment Law
    • Copyright IP & Technology Law
    • Data Privacy Law
    • Commercial Litigation Law
    • B-BBEE Law
    • Wills, Estates & Trusts
    • Family Law
    • Mediation & Arbitration
    • Conveyancing
    • NGO Law
    • Energy Law
    • Non-legal Services
  • Clients & Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Companies Act Amendments To Share Buy Backs, Resulting In Potential MOI Amendments

  • January 30, 2025
  • Abigail Reynolds (Corporate & Commercial Law Specialist)

Various amendments to the Companies Act (Act 71 of 2008) came into effect on 27 December 2024. These amendments were contained in the Companies Amendment Act (Act 16 of 2024) and in the Companies Second Amendment Act (Act 17 of 2024).

As a result of the amendments made to section 48(8), which governs share buy backs, private companies may need to amend a few provisions in their memorandums of incorporation (“MOI”). This will be the case where the MOI repeats the requirements of the older version of section 48(8).  Updating their MOIs will be desirable so that the company can benefit from the more beneficial new position in the Companies Act.

(Our clients need not make these amendments to the MOIs that we have drafted for them, but the information below about the amendments may still be of interest.)

Before these amendments came into effect, if the company wanted to buy back more than 5% of the issued shares of any class of its shares, it had to comply with all of the procedural requirements that apply to a scheme of arrangement (in section 114 and 115), and the consequent rights of shareholders in respect of a proposed scheme of arrangement also arose. Those requirements and consequences were quite onerous, could cause a delay in implementing the transaction, and would result in increased costs of the transaction. They included the following:

    • the requirement for an in person shareholders meeting where the special resolution to approve the buy back would be tabled (no round robin resolutions were allowed);
    • the requirement that the board engage the services of an independent expert to produce a report dealing with the fairness of the proposed share buy back transaction. This report then had to be shared with all shareholders;
    • a shareholder who voted against the proposed buy back could exercise their appraisal rights (under section 164), which would oblige the company to buy that shareholder’s shares at a set value;
    • shareholders who opposed the proposed buy back resolution, if they represented at least 15% of the voting rights that were exercised on that resolution, could approach a court to review the proposed buy back transaction, and the company would be prohibited from implementing the buy back while the court review was in process;

 

Under the recent amendments, all of the above falls away, and only a special resolution is required to approve the buy-back, which can be passed by round robin and need not be done in an in person meeting. This special resolution is however not required if the buy back forms part of a pro rata offer to all shareholders of the company or a particular share class (see the full wording of this exception in section 48(8)(b)], or unless the buy back will occur on a recognized stock exchange. 

One negative change for private companies is that now a buy back of less than 5% of any one class of shares also requires approval by special resolution. Previously, a  board resolution sufficed for this, as long as the buy back was not from a director, prescribed officer or person related to either of those.  In balance,  the current Companies Act position regarding buy backs is far more favourable to a company and its shareholders that wish to implement one.

About the author

Abigail Reynolds (Corporate & Commercial Law Specialist)

Abigail Reynolds is the founder and Principal Attorney of Reynolds Attorneys. She is a Corporate & Commercial Law Attorney and Qualified Mediator, and sits on the Company Law Matters Committee of the Law Society of South Africa, as well as the Commercial, Company, Consumer and Tax Law Committee of the Cape Law Society.
PrevPreviousMinister Parks Tau Approves The Legal Sector Code In Terms of Section 9(1) of The B-BBEE Act
NextGuidance Note on Direct MarketingNext

Contact Us

+27 84 556 8309
info@reynoldsattorneys.co.za

Connect with us

  • LinkedIn

Address

We are based in Cape Town but operate as a virtual office.

Navigation

Home
The Firm
Meet Our Consultants
Legal Services
Clients

Blog
Contact Us
Legals
PAIA Manual & Privacy Policy

 

Receive the latest industry news

Sign up to our newsletter today

Subscribe
We respect your privacy. See our Privacy Policy. We will only email you a few times a month and we won’t share your email address with anyone.

Nicole Copley

NGO law

Nicole Copley is an NGO lawyer who works for NGO clients all over South Africa and internationally. She qualified with a BA LLB LLM (Tax) from the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban (with a Masters in tax exemption), and is a Master Tax Practitioner SATM.

Nicole advises on, drafts and amends founding documents for and sets up every sort of organisation required by South African NGOs. She makes tax exemption and 18A (deduction of donations) applications, and applications to be registered with the Nonprofit Organisations Board. She (and her team) keep registrations up to date and assist with compliance and reporting. She also NPO reporting and other services. She advises on re-structuring and assists not-for-profits in understanding and applying the useful provisions of B-BBEE.

She also does commercial drafting work for her NGO clients, vetting and drafting agreements for them. She works for a wide range of types and sizes of organisations and aims to provide a pragmatic and efficient service. Her decades of experience in consulting to NGOs means she takes the long view, is focused on governance, ethics, credibility and sustainability and steers clients away from quick fixes, helping them build/renovate so that the organisation outlasts current office bearers.

Nicole works with other consultants to the not-for-profit sector, collaborating on training, newsletters, advising government on legislation for the sector and, most recently, a series of practical guides for the sector, called “NGO Matters”, originally published by Juta but now published by Nicole as NGO Matters Publications.

She has been a consultant since 2019.

  • info@reynoldsattorneys.co.za