Skip to content
ReynoldsAttorneys-logowebsite
  • Home
  • Meet Our Consultants
  • Legal Services
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
    • Labour & Employment Law
    • Copyright IP & Technology Law
    • Data Privacy Law
    • Commercial Litigation Law
    • B-BBEE Law
    • Wills, Estates & Trusts
    • Family Law
    • Mediation & Arbitration
    • Conveyancing
    • NGO Law
    • Energy Law
    • Non-legal Services
  • Clients & Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Meet Our Consultants
  • Legal Services
    • Corporate & Commercial Law
    • Labour & Employment Law
    • Copyright IP & Technology Law
    • Data Privacy Law
    • Commercial Litigation Law
    • B-BBEE Law
    • Wills, Estates & Trusts
    • Family Law
    • Mediation & Arbitration
    • Conveyancing
    • NGO Law
    • Energy Law
    • Non-legal Services
  • Clients & Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Business Rescue, Liquidation or Survival – Time to Make the Call?

  • July 8, 2020
  • PJ Veldhuizen (Commercial Litigation Specialist)

Big corporation or small enterprise – no business is immune to the current financial disaster 2020 has chauffeured in. We’ve seen the business rescue troubles of SAA unravel before our locked-down eyes, EDCON and Comair sending up an SOS flare and reports of indeterminable businesses (small and large) staring down the barrel of the COVID-19 gun. Company directors, management and owners remain in lockdown paralysis, hands tied, many unable to trade, raising the question: how much longer must we endure?

The fact of the matter, according to PJ Veldhuizen, is that directors of a company remain obligated by their legal and fiduciary duties. The CIPC has made it quite clear that the enforcement of section 22 of the Companies Act, although not invoked until 60 days after the lifting of the national state of disaster, remains. A company may not carry on its trading recklessly, with gross negligence or in insolvent circumstances. To add to this, the moratorium granted by the CIPC does not prohibit any third party from instituting a claim, leaving any business under stress wide open.

Veldhuizen says that it’s time for business to honestly assess their position, apply the financial distress test and consider their options.  Companies should perform the test to ascertain whether they are in “financial distress”, he says. “If the majority of the board decide that a company is in financial distress they have a few options to consider:

(a) resolve as a board to go into business rescue

(b) if it is too far gone and there is no reasonable prospect of trading out, file for liquidation or

(c) advise affected parties why they have elected not to resolve to enter business rescue. 

There are two main considerations in determining feasibility of business rescue, namely whether the company is financially distressed and whether there are any reasonable prospects of the business once again being profitable. For a company or close corporation to be regarded as being ‘financially distressed’, there must be no reasonable prospects that the company will be in a position to pay its debts as they become due and payable, within the immediately ensuing six months or else it must be reasonably likely that the company will become insolvent, within the immediate six months. The South African lockdown regulations are certainly going to test the strength of many a business, especially those who fall within level 3,2 and 1 of the lockdown ease.

Although business rescue has taken a bad rap thanks to several failed rescues, it stands as a viable option for a business to negotiate its way through and possibly out of this stressful financial period.

“This is not the time for analysis paralysis,” concludes Veldhuizen. Directors and business owners have a duty to their company, staff members and stakeholders which should not be ignored. You may be required to take steps that could include business rescue and an offer of compromise to your creditors or liquidation. “The failure to take these steps can render the board and those managing the trade and affairs of the company personally liable for its debts,” he warns.

About the author

PJ Veldhuizen (Commercial Litigation Specialist)

PJ Veldhuizen is a Commercial Litigation Attorney and Qualified Mediator and Arbitrator. He is an expert in advisory commercial litigation, company law, insolvency law, business rescue, consumer protection and dispute resolution, and has been a consultant for Reynolds Attorneys since 2011.
  • Business Rescue, Litigation, Lockdown
PrevPreviousMinimum Requirements for Complying with POPIA
NextMOI vs Shareholders AgreementsNext

Contact Us

+27 84 556 8309
info@reynoldsattorneys.co.za

Connect with us

  • LinkedIn

Address

We are based in Cape Town but operate as a virtual office.

Navigation

Home
The Firm
Meet Our Consultants
Legal Services
Clients

Blog
Contact Us
Legals
Privacy Policy

Receive the latest industry news

Sign up to our newsletter today

Subscribe
We respect your privacy. See our Privacy Policy. We will only email you a few times a month and we won’t share your email address with anyone.

Nicole Copley

NGO law

Nicole Copley is an NGO lawyer who works for NGO clients all over South Africa and internationally. She qualified with a BA LLB LLM (Tax) from the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban (with a Masters in tax exemption), and is a Master Tax Practitioner SATM.

Nicole advises on, drafts and amends founding documents for and sets up every sort of organisation required by South African NGOs. She makes tax exemption and 18A (deduction of donations) applications, and applications to be registered with the Nonprofit Organisations Board. She (and her team) keep registrations up to date and assist with compliance and reporting. She also NPO reporting and other services. She advises on re-structuring and assists not-for-profits in understanding and applying the useful provisions of B-BBEE.

She also does commercial drafting work for her NGO clients, vetting and drafting agreements for them. She works for a wide range of types and sizes of organisations and aims to provide a pragmatic and efficient service. Her decades of experience in consulting to NGOs means she takes the long view, is focused on governance, ethics, credibility and sustainability and steers clients away from quick fixes, helping them build/renovate so that the organisation outlasts current office bearers.

Nicole works with other consultants to the not-for-profit sector, collaborating on training, newsletters, advising government on legislation for the sector and, most recently, a series of practical guides for the sector, called “NGO Matters”, originally published by Juta but now published by Nicole as NGO Matters Publications.

She has been a consultant since 2019.

  • info@reynoldsattorneys.co.za